lexspeak |
Hi Folks |
 |
At a recently held conference of Company Secretaries, two eminent speakers on the dias, one an industry veteran and the other a seasoned bureaucrat cried hoarse that India is over-regulated. Both of them expressed concern that in the name of governance we are moving from ‘licence raj‘ to ‘regulation raj‘. So much so that wannabe entrepreneurs who are aplenty nowadays are shifting base to outside India albeit serving customers here. |
Even as I am writing this, yesterday’s The Hindu headline screams “Hemmed in by red tape, India’s tech stars flock to Silicon Valley”. Why, even our Prime Minister has time and gain emphasised the need to deregulate and even scrap some of the redundant laws. |
On the other hand is one of my associates, a Chartered Accountant who works with early stage entrepreneurs and start ups looking at their books of accounts to draw up Business Plans and Valuation figures. She screams “the quality of book-keeping is horrendous” and reflects an utter disdain to even the basic tenets of corporate accounting resulting in inflated turnover and profits. Are there no accounting standards ? Is there no body to oversee this ? Are there no qualified professionals ? of course, there are but unless policed (read regulated) they gloss over governance requirements, more so in early stage enterprises. Same is the case with respect to Company Secretarial records. Most of the first-time entrepreneurs do not even know what a Board is, what it is supposed to do, how is it different from the shareholders (which in most private limited companies consists of the same Board members) etc. While it is ok not to be aware, it is definitely not ok running a company like a partnership or a family business with the attitude of “we will close issues at the time of auditing”. Under the new Companies Act there is just no time to put off things. It can be done only at the risk of huge penalties and prosecution. It is an open secret that in many small companies, share certificates are “printed only for due diligence by the investor”, board and shareholder meetings are “minuted for the auditor to see”. The question asked is “who is going to check this?”, “what happens if I don’t comply?”, “is there a penalty?”, “will I go to jail?”. Perhaps this is the reason a very prescriptive Secretarial Standards (which tells you how to conduct meetings, number them, who sits where, put up a route map for a shareholders’ meeting etc.) has come up, effective 1st July, 2015. |
There are extremities in the entrepreneurial ecosystem and a balancing act is the need of the hour by the Government. Thankfully we are already seeing reversal of several provisions of the Companies Act, SEBI relaxing listing norms for start ups and a Government Committee to draw up special norms for SMEs. Perhaps a more self-disciplined attitude towards governance early on by start ups is also required so that when the investors come calling they need not “spruce up their books and be ready” so to say. If compliance is a habit, they will be geared up always. A little bit of compliance costs incurred consistently will surely go a long way in building enterprise value and reducing the investment transaction time. There are several technology-based compliance solutions in the market today. It would be worthwhile checking out www.cimplyfive.com, which has launched BLISS, a cloud-based software solution for company law compliances to begin with. |
Do hope you continue to find our fortnightly communication useful and interesting. Should you wish to refer to any of our older issues of Lexspeak, do visit our Resource Centre at sharadasc.com.
Warm regards

|
|
 |